Kenan Onel, M.D., Ph.D.
Pathways of Apoptosis and DNA Repair; Genetic
Susceptibility to Cancer
Research Summary
My lab studies the genetic basis of cancer
susceptibility. Genetically, we are all very similar, but not
identical. Some of this normal variation is insignificant, but some may
have important functional consequences. Our goal is to discover the
critical sources of functional heterogeneity in the pathways that are
the barriers against the cellular transition from normal to cancer. We
hope that these:
- 1. Will be clinically useful as biomakers of cancer
risk by which cancer prevention
strategies can be indivualized based on each person's unique genetic
endowment.
- 2. Will point towards noveltargets for new rationally
designed molecular
chemotherapeutics that short circuit abmormal pathways in cancer cells
while
sparing cancer patients the toxicities of currently used treatments.
Cancer results from a mutation or a series of mutations
that cause a cell to escape from normal regulatory controls. Cellular
stresses such as DNA damage vastly increase the rate of mutation, and
therefore, the likelihood of malignant transformation. Apoptosis, or
programmed cell death, is the primary cellular defense against the
oncogenic potential of these stresses, and so, our research has been
focused upon understanding the genetics of apoptosis.
The p53 tumor suppressor is the central mediator of
apoptosis. It is induced and activated by a variety of stresses, and
thereupon initiates transcriptional response programs that result in
apoptosis. Underscoring the importance of p53 is the observation that
it is mutated in half of all cases of cancer. As would be predicted,
concomitant defects in apoptosis are, in fact, a hallmark of cancer. If
loss of p53 is so important for cancer, it is a paradox that p53 is
almost never mutated in the most common pediatric cancer, acute
lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). This led us to hypothesize that even
within the spectrum of normal, genetic variation results in
heterogeneity in the p53-mediated apoptotic stress response. We found
that susceptibility to DNA damage-induced apoptosis is a genetically
determined program that is completely reproducible for a given
individual, but which varies significantly among individuals. We have
also identified several polymorphic variants within the p53 pathway
that both alter the p53-mediated apoptotic response to stress, and
which are associated with increased cancer risk.
We are now searching for other sources of genetic
variation – both intrinsic to the p53 pathway and extrinsic to the p53
pathway -- that alter susceptibility to damage-induced apoptosis, and
which may be biomarkers for cancer susceptibility, or targets for new
cancer therapies. Towards this end, we have four major projects ongoing
utilizing both genome-wide and candidate gene approaches.
1. The identification
of the genetic determinants of apoptosis:
Using about 400 cell lines from over 30 well-characterized
multigenerational pedigrees, we are employing an unbiased genome-wide
strategy to map by linkage analysis the genomic loci that contain the
critical genetic determinants of DNA damage-induced apoptosis. As the
polymorphic sequence variants identified by this study modulate the
efficiency of the apoptotic response to oncogenic stress in different
individuals, they are likely to translate into clinical tests by which
cancer risk can be assessed and quantified.
2. The identification
of the p53 network of apoptosis:
Although a number of p53 target genes have been identified, it remains
unclear how p53 regulates apoptosis. We are using a genetic approach
and expression microarray analysis to identify and model the
p53-dependent transcriptional network of apoptosis. Identified p53
target genes will be attractive candidates for extensive resequencing
to identify functional SNPs that may be clinically significant markers
of disease risk. They may also be exciting novel targets for new
therapeutics.
3. The identification
of novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets in pediatric leukemia:
By array-based comparative genomic hybridization, we are mapping
genomic regions amplified or deleted in pediatric ALL and comparing
these to genomic loci commonly amplified or deleted in adult onset ALL.
correlating this with a powerful predictor of outcome, the Day 7 bone
marrow analysis. These regions will very likely contain oncogenes or
tumor suppressors that are under selective pressure in ALL, and which
may be biomarkers predictive of outcome, or novel therapeutic targets.
4. The identification
of genomic susceptibility loci in secondary leukemia:
Using both genome-wide and candidate gene approaches, we are mapping
susceptibility loci for secondary AML in a large and well-characterized
cohort of patients. Because these patients develop leukemia following
prior treatment with DNA-damaging agents, the identification of the
genetic determinants of susceptibility may lead to insights into the
critical genes and pathways by which cells generally respond to
mutagens and other carcinogenic stresses, and thereby prevent
oncogenesis. In addition, clinically, if cancer survivors at the
greatest risk for the development of t-AML can be identified at the
time of their initial diagnosis, then it may be possible to alter their
chemotherapeutic regimen to reflect this risk, and thereby protect them
from this devastating condition.
Selected Papers
Cole PD, Suh JS, Onel K, Stiles J, Armstrong D and
Dunkel IJ. (2001). Benign outcome of RSV infection in children with
cancer. Med. Pediatr. Oncol. 37: 24-29.
Onel K and Steinherz PG. (2002). The treatment of
pediatric AML (Editorial). Oncology 16: 1066-1069.
Onel K and Steinherz PG. (2002). The treatment of
pediatric AML: past, present, and future (Editorial). Cancer
Investigation 20: 1117.
Baumler C, Duan F, Onel K, Jhanwar S, Rapaport B, Offit
K and Elkon KB. (2003). Differential recruitment of caspase 8 to cFlip
confers sensitivity or resistance to Fas-mediated apoptosis in a subset
of familial lymphoma patients. Leukemia Res. 27: 841-851.
Onel K and Cordon-Cardo C. (2004). MDM2 and Prognosis.
Mol. Canc. Res. 2: 1-8.
Onel K and Bussel JB. (2004). Adverse effects of
estrogen
therapy in women with existing ITP. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2: 670-671.
Onel K, Siddiqui R, Facio F and Offit K. (2004). The
genetics of familial lymphomas. Current Onc. Reports 6: 380-387.
Bond GL, Hu W, Bond EE, Robins H, Lutzker SG, Arva NC,
Bargonetti J, Bartel F, Taubert H, Wuerl P, Onel K, Yip L, Hwang SJ,
Strong LC, Lozano G, Levine AJ. (2004). A single nucleotide
polymorphism
in the MDM2 promoter attenuates the p53 tumor suppressor pathway and
accelerates tumor formation in humans. Cell 119: 591-602.
Onel K, Siddiqui R, Facio F, Nafa K, Diaz LR, Kauff N,
Huang H, Robson M, Ellis NA and Offit K. (2004). The TP53 mutational
spectrum and frequency of CHEK2*1100delC in Li-Fraumeni-like kindreds.
Familial Cancer (in press).
|